American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157–197.ĭuBois, D. Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: a meta-analytic review. Karcher (Eds), The Handbook of Youth Mentoring (2nd edn). Youth mentoring in contemporary perspective. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 245–270.ĭuBois, D., & Karcher, M. Naturally occurring mentoring in Japan and the United States: social roles and correlates. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University.ĭarling, N., Hamilton, S., Toyokawa, T., & Matsuda, S. Evaluating the influence of participation in a diverse high school-based group mentoring program. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, 1–35.Ĭohen, J. How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 129–142.Ĭheung, M. Pathways of influence in school-based mentoring: the mediating role of parent and teacher relationships. Los Angeles: Sage.Ĭhan, C., Rhodes, J., Howard, W., Schwartz, S., Lowe, S., & Herrera, C. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Mentoring (2nd Edn, pp. Handbook of youth mentoring, 29–43.Ĭavell, T. Reading Research and Instruction, 43(2), 87–103.Ĭavell, T. The effectiveness of the hosts program in improving the reading achievement of children at-risk for reading failure. A secure base: parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 717–735.īowlby, J. Social competence, externalizing, and internalizing behavior adjustment from early childhood through early adolescence: developmental cascades. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.īornstein, M. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Mentoring (pp. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(7), 845–859.īogat, G. Building the youth mentoring knowledge base: publishing trends and coauthorship networks. Matching by race and gender in mentoring relationships: Keeping our eyes on the prize. Psychological inquiry, 5(1), 27–30.īlake‐Beard, S., Bayne, M. Attachment and close relationships: An individual-difference perspective. Home visiting for adolescent mothers: effects on parenting, maternal life course, and primary care linkage. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12, 154–174.īarnet, B., Liu, J., DeVoe, M., Alperovitz-Bichell, K., & Duggan, A. Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: a step-by-step tutorial. Journal of Youth Development, 6(3), 80–92.Īssink, M., & Wibbelink, C. From then to now: emerging directions for youth program evaluation. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Īrnold, M. Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth. Taken together, these findings provide some support for the efficacy of mentoring interventions, while also emphasizing the need to remain realistic about the modest impact of these programs as currently implemented, and highlighting opportunities for improving the quality and rigor of mentoring practices.Īos, S., Lieb, R., Mayfield, M., Miller, M., & Pennucci, A. Moderation analyses indicated that programs serving a larger proportion of male youth, deploying a greater percentage of male mentors or mentors with a helping profession background, and requiring shorter meetings yielded larger effect sizes, as did evaluations that relied on questionnaires and youth self-report. The observed effect size fell within the medium/moderate range according to empirical guidelines derived from universal prevention programs for youth, and was consistent with past meta-analyses of youth mentoring. Analysis of 70 mentoring outcome studies, with a sample size of 25,286 youth (average age of 12 years old), yielded a statistically significant effect of mentoring programs across all youth outcomes. The present study involved a comprehensive meta-analysis of all outcome studies of intergenerational, one-on-one youth mentoring programs written in the English language between 19, using rigorous inclusion criteria designed to align with developmental theories of youth mentoring. However, important questions remain about the extent to which these interventions improve youth outcomes. Mentoring programs, which pair youth with caring, non-parental adults with the goal of promoting positive youth development, are an increasingly popular strategy for early intervention with at-risk youth.
0 kommentar(er)
